4.0 Article

Expression of miRNA-210 in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells under oxygen deprivation

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 201-208

出版社

INST BIOLOSKA ISTRAZIVANJA SINISA STANKOVIC
DOI: 10.2298/ABS181117001L

关键词

mesenchymal stromal cells; oxygen deprivation; miRNA-210; HIF-1 alpha; HIF-2 alpha

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [III41004]
  2. EFS French Blood Institute
  3. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs [UMR 3427/US 005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major limitation in the development of efficient clinical protocols for mesenchymal stromal cell (MStroC)-based tissue regeneration therapy is the low retention and survival of MStroC in injured tissue after therapeutic administration. Low oxygen concentration preconditioning (LOP) during ex vivo cultivation of MStroC, as a method for mimicking oxygenation in their physiological microenvironment, has been shown to be beneficial in clinical trials using MStroC. Introducing hypoxia-mimicking molecules into MStroC during cultivation could be an advantageous LOP strategy. MicroRNA (miRNA) drugs are good candidates for this approach. Analysis of the expression of miRNA-210 in human bone marrow-derived MStroC in conditions of acute and extended hypoxia (24 to 72 h) was performed using RT-qPCR methodology. HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha gene knockdown cell lines were generated using lentiviral transduction of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) in order to examine whether miRNA-210 expression is regulated by transcription factor HIF-1 and/or HIF-2. We detected a significant increase in miRNA-210 expression in hypoxic conditions at time points of 24, 48 and 72 h (p<0.05). Knocking down of HIF-1 alpha and HIF-2 alpha genes indicated involvement of both transcription factors in the elevation of miRNA-210 expression. These results point to miRNA-210 as a good candidate for a hypoxia-mimicking molecule in LOP strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据