4.6 Article

Detection of uric acid based on doped ZnO/ Ag2O/ Co3O4 nanoparticle loaded glassy carbon electrode

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 22, 页码 8651-8659

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9nj01287g

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials Research (CEAMR), Chemistry Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A highly sensitive uric acid ( UA) sensor was fabricated using a wet- chemical ( co- precipitation) method to prepare doped ZnO/ Ag2O/ Co3O4 nanoparticles ( NPs) and load them onto a glassy carbon electrode ( GCE) by an electrochemical approach. The detailed characterization of the NPs was performed by using conventional methods, such as X- ray photoelectron spectroscopy ( XPS), ultraviolet- visible spectroscopy ( UV- vis.), Fourier- transform infrared spectroscopy ( FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy ( FESEM), Tunneling electron microscopy ( TEM), energy- dispersive X- ray spectroscopy ( EDS), and X- ray powder diffraction ( XRD) analysis. Thermal gravimetric analysis ( TGA) of the as- prepared ternary NPs was performed in order to study the stability of NPs in different temperature ranges over which the weight loss and thermal effect are significant. During the electrochemical analysis, the proposed UA sensor was found to be linear over a large linear dynamic range ( LRD; 0.1 nM- 0.01 mM). The analytical performance of the sensor such as sensitivity ( 82.3323 mA mM 1 cm 2) was estimated from the slope of the calibration curve and the detection limit ( 89.14 4.46 pM) was calculated at a signal to noise ratio of 3. The proposed UA biosensor showed reliable reproducibility, a short response time ( 22.0 s), long- term stability, and no interference effects. The ZnO/ Ag2O/ Co3O4 NPs/ GCE sensor was also validated with real biological samples. Thus, this method might be a prospective and reliable method for the future development of enzyme- free biosensors using doped ternary metal oxides in broad scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据