4.7 Article

MicroRNA-223 demonstrated experimentally in exosome-like vesicles is associated with decreased risk of persistent pain after lumbar disc herniation

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1194-8

关键词

Lumbar radicular pain; Disc herniation; Inflammation; Immune response; microRNA-223; miR-223

资金

  1. South Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority [2013/20589]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous findings have demonstrated that lumbar radicular pain after disc herniation may be associated with up-regulation of inflammatory mediators. In the present study we examined the possible role of extracellular microRNAs (miRs) in this process. Methods: Single unit recordings, isolation of exosome-like vesicles, electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis, western blot analysis and qPCR were used in rats to demonstrate the effect of nucleus pulposus (NP) applied onto the dorsal nerve roots. ELISA and qPCR were used to measure the level of circulating IL-6 and miRs in a 1-year observational study in patients after disc herniation. Results: In the rats, enhanced spinal cord nociceptive responses were displayed after NP applied onto the dorsal nerve roots. An increased release of small non-coding RNAs, including miR-223, miR-760 and miR-145, from NP in exosome-like vesicles was demonstrated. In particular, the NP expression of miR-223, which inhibited the nociceptive spinal signalling, was increased. In the patients, increased extracellular miR-223 was also verified in the acute phase after disc herniation. The increased miR-223 expression was, however, only observed in those who recovered (sex, age and smoking were included as covariates). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that miR-223, which can be released from the NP after disc herniation, attenuates the neuronal activity in the pain pathways. Dysregulation of miR-223 may predict chronic lumbar radicular pain. Trial registration/ethics REK 2014/1725

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据