4.8 Article

Motivation and challenges for e-commerce in e-waste recycling under Big data context: A perspective from household willingness in China

期刊

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 436-444

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.03.001

关键词

E-waste; Recycling; Household behavior; E-commerce; Residential acceptance

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [71774014, 71403021, 91746208, 71521002, 71573016]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0602502, 2016YFA0602504]
  3. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [71625003]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560051, 2017M620648]
  5. Hong Kong Scholar Program [XJ2014002]
  6. Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education
  7. Distinguished Professor of Yangtse River Scholar of MOE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the emerging technology and consumption modes under Big data context, e-commerce has arisen as a new trend for e-waste recycling. This paper conducted a questionnaire survey from 896 residents living in the cities of China, to explore the development of e-commerce in e-waste recycling. An ordered logit regression model was employed to reveal the key drivers and barriers for residents to choose e-commerce for their e-waste recycling. The results show that e-commerce in e-waste recycling does not receive a universal acceptance from residents. The perceived convenience, attitude and subjective norm are positively related to the residential intensions towards employing e-commerce for e-waste recycling. The price disadvantage of e-waste collection by e-commerce is the major barrier for taking e-commerce for e-waste recycling. However, the relationship between e-commerce recycling willingness and perceived price disadvantage is moderated by e-waste disposal subsidy. Facility accessibility also plays a moderate role in the relationship between e-commerce recycling willingness and perceived convenience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据