4.2 Article

Environmentally realistic exposure to weathered North Sea oil: Sublethal effects in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2017.1352195

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nordic Council of Ministers
  2. Icelandic Fisheries Project Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With increasing oil and gas activities and transport in the Arctic, there is a need to understand how operational or accidental releases of substances affect marine organisms from a pristine environment. The aim of the current study was to describe and compare the responses of two marine fish species, Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus), following exposure to three levels (low, medium, high) of the water-soluble fraction of a North Sea crude oil for 16 days. The exposure system simulated environmental exposure by allowing clean seawater to percolate through gravel covered in weathered oil before being introduced to aquaria. Both polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) metabolite bile concentrations and cytochrome P4501A (CYP1A) levels and activity increased markedly in comparison with controls in both species, but there were no significant differences between the three exposures. Turbot possessed 4-5-fold higher concentrations of two PAH bile metabolites compared to Atlantic cod by day 8. In contrast, hepatic CYP1A activity in cod was consistently 2-6-fold higher than in turbot with increasing differences over the experimental period. Baseline DNA strand breaks in lymphocytes and kidney cells were low in both species, but was elevated for all treatments by day two. There were no marked indications of the treatments affecting immune functions in either species. This investigation demonstrated that there may be significant differences in responses between species receiving identical exposures and that DNA strand breaks in lymphocytes and kidney cells are sensitive to confinement stress. Data also indicate that some species, such as turbot, may adapt to treatments within days and weeks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据