4.1 Article

Effect of dibutyltin on placental and fetal toxicity in rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 741-753

出版社

JAPANESE SOC TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.2131/jts.42.741

关键词

Dibutyltin; LA-ICP-MS; Malformation; Placenta; Rat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to elucidate the effect of chorioallantoic and yolk sac placenta on the embryonic/fetal toxicity in dibutyltin dichloride (DBTC1)-exposed rats, we examined the histopathological changes and the tissue distribution of dibutyltin in the placentas and embryos. DBTC1 was orally administered to the groups at doses of 0 mg/kg during gestation days (GD)s 7-9 (control group) and 20 mg/kg during GDs 7-9 (GD7-9 treated group), and GDs 10-12 (GD10-12 treated group). The total fetal mortality was increased, and malformations characterized by craniofacial dysmolphism were detected in the GD7-9 treated group. The embryonic/fetal weight and placental weight showed a decrease in both DBTC1-treated groups. Histologically, some embryos on GD 9.5 in.the GD7-9 treated group underwent apoptosis without any changes of yolk sac. In the laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry analysis (LA-ICP-MS), tin was detected in the embryo, allantois, yolk sac, ectoplacental cone and decidual mass surrounding the conceptus on GD 9.5 in the GD7-9 treated group. Thus, it is considered that the embryo in this period is specifically sensitive to DBTC1-induced apoptosis, compared with other parts. The chorioallantoic placentas in both DBTC1-treated groups showed the developmental delay and hypoplasia in the fetal parts of placenta, resulting from apoptosis and mitotic inhibition. Thus, it was speculated that the DBTC1-induced malformations and fetal resorption resulted from the apoptosis in the embryo caused by the direct effect of DBTC1. The DBTC1-induced lesions in the chorioallantoic placenta were a non-specific transient developmental retardation in the fetal parts of placenta, leading to intrauterine growth retardation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据