4.2 Review

Review: Sex-Based Differences in Treatment Outcomes for Persons With Opioid Use Disorder

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 246-261

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajad.12921

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse: NIDA [R21 DA035327, T32 DA07209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objectives In order to address the current opioid crisis, research on treatment outcomes for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) should account for biological factors that could influence individual treatment response. Women and men might have clinically meaningful differences in their experience in OUD treatment and might also have unique challenges in achieving successful, long-term recovery. This review summarizes and synthesizes the current literature on sex-based differences in OUD treatment outcomes. Methods Relevant literature was identified via automated and manual searches using the terms opioid treatment outcome sex [or gender] differences and opiate treatment outcome sex [or gender] differences. Search methodology was consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and were conducted within the PubMed electronic database during March and April of 2018. Results The initial PubMed search yielded 241 manuscripts and 31 original research articles that met inclusion/exclusion criteria were synthesized in this review. Several important trends emerged, including findings that women are more likely than men to present to treatment with co-occurring mental health conditions such as depression, and that women might respond particularly well to buprenorphine maintenance. Discussion and Conclusions While much of the literature on this topic is subject to potential cohort effects, interventions that address co-occurring mental health conditions and psychosocial stress might improve treatment outcomes for women with OUD. Scientific Significance Funding agencies and researchers should focus attention toward human laboratory studies and clinical trials that are prospectively designed to assess sex-based differences in OUD recovery. (Am J Addict 2019;28:246-261)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据