4.6 Article

Consensus on the standardization of terminology in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and related thrombotic microangiopathies

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 312-322

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.13571

关键词

ADAMTS-13 protein, human; diagnosis, differential; thrombocytopenia; thrombotic microangiopathy; thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

资金

  1. EHA-SWG platelet group
  2. MRC [G0800671] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. British Heart Foundation [PG/15/103/31900, FS/10/013/28073] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [G0800671] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) are two important acute conditions to diagnose. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a broad pathophysiologic process that leads to microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia, and involves capillary and smallvessel platelet aggregates. The most common cause is disseminated intravascular coagulation, which may be differentiated by abnormal coagulation. Clinically, a number of conditions present with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia, including cancer, infection, transplantation, drug use, autoimmune disease, and preeclampsia and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelet count syndrome in pregnancy. Despite overlapping clinical presentations, TTP and HUS have distinct pathophysiologies and treatment pathways. Objectives: To present a consensus document from an International Working Group on TTP and associated thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). Methods: The International Working Group has proposed definitions and terminology based on published information and consensus-based recommendations. Conclusion: The consensus aims to aid clinical decisions, but also future studies and trials, utilizing standardized definitions. It presents a classification of the causes of TMA, and criteria for clinical response, remission and relapse of congenital and immune-mediated TTP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据