3.8 Article

Using word embeddings to expand terminology of dietary supplements on clinical notes

期刊

JAMIA OPEN
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 246-253

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz007

关键词

word embeddings; terminology expansion; natural language processing; dietary supplements; clinical notes

资金

  1. National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health Award [R01AT009457]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Science [U01TR002062, 1UL1TR002494]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility of applying word embeddings to expand the terminology of dietary supplements (DS) using over 26 million clinical notes. Methods: Word embedding models (ie, word2vec and GloVe) trained on clinical notes were used to predefine a list of top 40 semantically related terms for each of 14 commonly used DS. Each list was further evaluated by experts to generate semantically similar terms. We investigated the effect of corpus size and other settings (ie, vector size and window size) as well as the 2 word embedding models on performance for DS term expansion. We compared the number of clinical notes (and patients they represent) that were retrieved using the word embedding expanded terms to both the baseline terms and external DS sources expanded terms. Results: Using the word embedding models trained on clinical notes, we could identify 1-12 semantically similar terms for each DS. Using the word embedding expanded terms, we were able to retrieve averagely 8.39% more clinical notes and 11.68% more patients for each DS compared with 2 sets of terms. The increasing corpus size results in more misspellings, but not more semantic variants and brand names. Word2vec model is also found more capable of detecting semantically similar terms than GloVe. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the utility of word embeddings on clinical notes for terminology expansion on 14 DS. We propose that this method can be potentially applied to create a DS vocabulary for downstream applications, such as information extraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据