3.8 Article

Effects of Probiotic Use on Bacterial Translocation in Created Rat Models with Biliary Obstructions

期刊

EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 106-111

出版社

AVES
DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.18426

关键词

Bacterial translocation; bile duct obstructions; gram-negative microorganism; combined use of probiotic microorganisms; liver damage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effects of the combined use of probiotic strains on the development of bacterial translocation in addition to liver and intestinal tissue damage due to biliary obstruction in rats. Materials and Methods: Here, 3 groups each consisting of 10 rats were created: group 1 (sham group), group 2 (obstructive jaundice), and group 3 (obstructive jaundice+ probiotic). Groups 1 and 2 were given 1 cc physiological saline solution by oral gavage twice a day; group 3 was given a probiotic solution that included Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Enterococcus faecium, and Bifidobacterium longum microorganisms by oral gavage twice a day. Results: Markers for liver damage were also found to be significantly improved (p<0.05) in the treatment group (group 3). Whencompared with groups 2 and 3 in terms of liver histology, damage was found to be significantly more severe in group 2 (p< 0.01). With regard to ileal villous depth and ileal inflammation, the pathology was found to be significantly more severe in group 2 than that in group 3 (p<0.05). In blood, spleen, and mesenteric lymph node cultures, group 2 showed a microbiological growth rate of 33.8-58.8%, whereas group 3 showed a microbiological growth rate of 14.3-28.6%. This reduction was evaluated to be statistically significant (p< 0.05). Conclusion: Our study showed that the combined use of a probiotic in bile duct obstructions reduced bacterial translocation and alleviated pathological changes arising in the liver and terminal ileum histology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据