4.6 Article

Midterm, multicenter clinical and hemodynamic results for the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.09.089

关键词

aortic valve replacement; bioprosthesis; gradient; durability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the midterm hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of the Trifecta aortic pericardial valve. Methods: In a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, follow-up study, 710 patients underwent surgical implantation of a pericardial stented aortic prosthesis (Trifecta valve; St Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minn). The valve is constructed from bovine pericardium mounted externally onto a titanium stent. Subjects were followed on an annual basis over 6 years. Results: Operations were performed from 2007 to 2009, and mean age was 72.4 +/- 9.3 years; 471 of 710 (66.3%) were men. Preoperatively, 361 of 710 (50.8%) of patients were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and at 6 years postoperatively, 92 of 96 (95.8%) were New York Heart Association class I or II. Six years postoperatively, average mean gradient across all valve sizes was 11.0 mm Hg, and the average effective orifice area index was 0.80 cm(2) /m(2). The proportion of patients without moderate-to-severe valvular regurgitation at 6 years was 95.2% (80/ 84). Six years postoperatively, freedom from valve-related mortality, nonstructural dysfunction, and paravalvular leak were 98.3%, 98.6%, and 98.9%, respectively, and freedom from reoperation due to structural valve deterioration was 97.3% (95% confidence limits, 98.6-94.7). Conclusion: These midterm results demonstrate that the Trifecta valve is a safe and effective valve substitute with excellent hemodynamic performance and durability that is maintained through the 6-year follow-up period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据