4.5 Article

The effect of body fat percentage and body fat distribution on skin surface temperature with infrared thermography

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 1-9

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2017.03.006

关键词

Thermal imaging; Thermal distribution; Skin temperature; Body Composition; Adipose tissue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to search for relations between body fat percentage and skin temperature and to describe possible effects on skin temperature as a result of fat percentage in each anatomical site. Women (26.11 +/- 4.41 years old) (n =123) were tested for: body circumferences; skin temperatures (thermal camera); fat percentage and lean mass from trunk, upper and lower limbs; and body fat percentage (Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry). Values of minimum (T-Mi), maximum (T-Ma), and mean temperatures (T-Me) were acquired in 30 regions of interest. Pearson's correlation was estimated for body circumferences and skin temperature variables with body fat percentage. Participants were divided into groups of high and low fat percentage of each body segment, of which T-Me values were compared with Student's t-test. Linear regression models for predicting body fat percentage were tested. Body fat percentage was positively correlated with body circumferences and palm temperatures, while it was negatively correlated with most temperatures, such as T-Ma and T-Me of posterior thighs (r =-0.495 and -0.432), TMe of posterior lower limbs (r =-0.488), T-Ma of anterior thighs (r =-0.406) and T-Mi and T-Me of posterior arms (r =-0.447 and -0.430). Higher fat percentages in the specific anatomical sites tended to decrease T-Me, especially in posterior thighs, shanks and arms. Skin temperatures and body circumferences predicted body fat percentage with 58.3% accuracy (R =0.764 and R-2 =0.583). This study clarifies that skin temperature distribution is influenced by the fat percentage of each body segment. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据