4.6 Article

Mosaic rGO layers on lithium metal anodes for the effective mediation of lithium plating and stripping

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 19, 页码 12214-12224

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta03679b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21701118, 21805201]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20161209, BK20160323, BK20170341, 17KJB430028]
  3. Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [18KJA480004]
  4. Key Technology Initiative of Suzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [SYG201748]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2017M611899, 2018T110544]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The passivation of lithium metal anodes to mitigate an unstable solid electrolyte interface and parasitic dendrite growth is the key premise for their successful implementation in lithium metal batteries. Herein, aiming to simultaneously reduce the interfacial resistance and to suppress lithium dendrites, we coated lithium metal anodes with two-dimensional (2D) rGO layers prepared via a solvent-evaporation-assisted self-assembly. Upon lithiation/delithiation, the rGO coating cracked into mosaic-like flakes, in between which the interconnected gaps served as the passage for uniform lithium plating/stripping. Half cells composed of a sandwich Cu/Li/rGO electrode vs. Cu foils revealed much improved Li usage and coulombic efficiencies. Through ex situ SEM imaging and XPS depth profiling, a comprehensive view of Li intercalation, deposition, and dendrite suppression on the rGO coating was obtained. As a result of the improved kinetics of Li transportation, excellent electrochemical performances were demonstrated in symmetric gLigLi cells with a stabilized overpotential of only 87.9 mV at 5 mA cm(-2) over 600 cycles, and in Li-S batteries with a stabilized capacity of 1200 mA h g(-1) at 1C near 1000 cycles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据