4.0 Article

Altered vascular function in chronic kidney disease: evidence from passive leg movement

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS
卷 7, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.14814/phy2.14075

关键词

CKD; endothelial function; flow-mediated dilation; nitric oxide; PLM

资金

  1. NIH-NIGMS [P20GM113125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease and is characterized by reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and vascular dysfunction, typically assessed using brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD). It has been previously reported that passive leg movement (PLM)-induced hyperemia, an assessment of lower extremity vascular function, is highly dependent on NO, but has not yet been utilized to assess vascular function in patients with CKD. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively assess vascular function in patients with CKD using PLM, in addition to the traditional FMD technique. Assessment of vascular function via PLM and FMD was performed on 12 patients (CKD, 66 +/- 3 years) and 16 age-matched healthy controls (CON, 60 +/- 2 years). Blood velocity and artery diameters during PLM and FMD were measured using duplex ultrasound of the femoral and brachial arteries, respectively. Habitual physical activity, assessed by accelerometry, was performed in a subset of each group. CKD patients had reduced peak leg blood flow (LBF) (384 +/- 39 vs. 569 +/- 77 mL/min, P < 0.05) and change in LBF from baseline to peak (.peakLBF) (143 +/- 22 vs. 249 +/- 34 mL/min, P < 0.05) during PLM compared to CON. Additionally, PLM responses were significantly associated with kidney function and physical activity levels. As anticipated, FMD was significantly attenuated in CKD patients (5.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 8.8 +/- 1.2%, P < 0.05). In conclusion, both upper and lower extremity measures of vascular function indicate impairment in CKD patients when compared to controls. PLM appears to be a novel and feasible approach to assessing lower extremity vascular function in CKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据