3.8 Article

Study on the site selection for synchronous condenser responding to commutation failures of multi-infeed HVDC system

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING-JOE
卷 -, 期 16, 页码 1413-1418

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2018.8807

关键词

power transmission faults; HVDC power transmission; HVDC power convertors; power grids; commutation; reactive power; power capacitors; synchronous condenser; multiinfeed HVDC system; power system; ultrahigh-voltage AC; DC hybrid power grid; receiving-end AC grid; high-voltage DC system; short-time huge power shortage; multiinfeed interaction factor; multiinfeed high-voltage DC system; simultaneous commutation failures; simultaneous CF; power grid stability; transient recovery process; optimal dynamic reactive power compensation site layer by layer; multiinfeed effective short-circuit ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Power system shows increasingly prominent characteristic of strong DC and weak AC' at the primary construction stage of ultrahigh-voltage AC/DC hybrid power grid. Faults occurring in the receiving-end AC grid of the multi-infeed high-voltage DC (HVDC) system may result in simultaneous commutation failures (CFs) and short-time huge power shortage, which are great threats to the stability of power grid. Owing to the strong support ability in reactive power, rotary inertia, and capacity of short circuit, synchronous condenser (SC) has received more and more attention in restraining CFs of multi-infeed HVDC and speeding up transient recovery process after faults. From the angle of interplay between multi-infeed HVDC systems, this study analyses SCs' superiority in restraining CFs, and then determines the optimal dynamic reactive power compensation site layer by layer combining with multi-infeed interaction factor, multi-infeed effective short-circuit ratio, and relative-transient-voltage-drop-area index. Finally, this study proposes a reliable and applicable site selection scheme for SCs to restrain CFs of the multi-infeed HVDC system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据