4.6 Article

A microfluidics assay to study invasion of human placental trophoblast cells

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0131

关键词

microfluidics; placentation; trophoblast; human

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [090108/Z/09/Z, 085992/Z/08/Z]
  2. British Heart Foundation [PG/09/077/27964]
  3. Centre for Trophoblast Research
  4. EPSRC Doctoral Training Award [1354760]
  5. German National Academic Foundation PhD studentship
  6. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  7. British Heart Foundation [PG/09/077/27964] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MR/P001092/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction and stillbirth are major pregnancy disorders throughout the world. The underlying pathogenesis of these diseases is defective placentation characterized by inadequate invasion of extravillous placental trophoblast cells into the uterine arteries. How trophoblast invasion is controlled remains an unanswered question but is influenced by maternal uterine immune cells called decidual natural killer cells. Here, we describe an in vitro microfluidic invasion assay to study the migration of primary human trophoblast cells. Each experiment can be performed with a small number of cells making it possible to conduct research on human samples despite the challenges of isolating primary trophoblast cells. Cells are exposed to a chemical gradient and tracked in a threedimensional microenvironment using real-time high-resolution imaging, so that dynamic readouts on cell migration such as directionality, motility and velocity are obtained. The microfluidic system was validated using isolated trophoblast and a gradient of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, a cytokine produced by activated decidual natural killer cells. This microfluidic model provides detailed analysis of the dynamics of trophoblast migration compared to previous assays and can be modified in future to study in vitro how human trophoblast behaves during placentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据