4.6 Review

Harmonic Source Detection Methods: A Systematic Literature Review

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 74283-74299

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921149

关键词

Harmonic distortion; harmonic source detection; renewable energy sources and distributed power generation

资金

  1. Mwalimu Nyerere African Union Scholarship Scheme
  2. Centre for Distributed Power and Electronic Systems (CDPES)
  3. Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Cape Peninsula University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ensuring the quality of power supply is a main target of the power utility companies worldwide. Harmonic distortion is one of the power quality problems that can result either from upstream (utility side) through background harmonic, downstream (customer's side) through non-linear loads, or renewable energy generators. The detection of harmonic sources at the point of common coupling (PCC) is a major concern for both utilities and customers. Various methods have been proposed since the 1990s to be used for harmonic source detection. These methods have been classified into three categories based on the direction of active power flow, reactive power, and voltage-current ratio. In this paper, a systematic literature review is done on the state of the art of current research on the harmonic source detection methods, in order to select the method that gives better practical and commercial results to be used when multiple customers are connected at the PCC. This systematic literature review recognized that most studies concentrated only on harmonic source detection between a customer and utility but the practical power system has multiple customers connected to the PCC with different load conditions. Therefore, the results obtained from this paper review will be useful for researchers and engineers working in the modern grids, who aim to develop a practical and commercial method to quantify the harmonic contribution for different customers and utility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据