4.7 Article

PI3K alpha and delta promote hematopoietic stem cell activation

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 4, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.125832

关键词

-

资金

  1. New York Stem Cell Science grant [C029154]
  2. NIH [R01CA196973, K08CA149208, R35 CA210057, R01CA187918, R01DK119394]
  3. American Society of Hematology Scholar Award
  4. AECOM
  5. Albert Einstein Cancer Center
  6. Einstein Training Program in Stem Cell Research from the Empire State Stem Cell Fund through New York State Department of Health [C30292GG]
  7. Albert Einstein Cancer Center Support grant from the NIH [P30CA013330]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many cytokines and chemokines that are important for hematopoiesis activate the PI3K signaling pathway. Because this pathway is frequently mutated and activated in cancer, PI3K inhibitors have been developed for the treatment of several malignancies and are now being tested in the clinic in combination with chemotherapy. However, the role of PI3K in adult hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), particularly during hematopoietic stress, is still unclear. We previously showed that the individual PI3K catalytic isoforms p110 alpha and p110 beta have dispensable roles in HSC function, suggesting redundancy between PI3K isoforms in HSCs. We now demonstrate that simultaneous deletion of p110 alpha and p110 delta in double-knockout (DKO) HSCs uncovers their redundant requirement in HSC cycling after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy administration. In contrast, DKO HSCs were still able to exit quiescence in response to other stress stimuli, such as LPS. We found that DKO HSCs and progenitors had impaired sensing of inflammatory signals ex vivo, and that levels of IL-1 beta and MIG were higher in the bone marrow (BM) after LPS than after 5-FU administration. Furthermore, exogenous in vivo administration of IL-1 beta could induce cell cycle entry of DKO HSCs. Our findings have clinical implications for the use of PI3K inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据