4.5 Article

Automatic pollen recognition with the Rapid-E particle counter: the first-level procedure, experience and next steps

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 3435-3452

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-12-3435-2019

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Social Fund [09.3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0066]
  2. Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)
  3. Academy of Finland (PS4A grant) [318194]
  4. Real-ForAll project - Interreg IPA Cross-border Cooperation Programme Croatia-Serbia 2014-2020 [2017HR-RS151]
  5. Provincial Secretariat for Science, Autonomous Province Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [318194, 318194] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pollen-induced allergies are among the most prevalent non-contagious diseases, with about a quarter of the European population being sensitive to various atmospheric bioaerosols. In most European countries, pollen information is based on a weekly-cycle Hirst-type pollen trap method. This method is labour-intensive and requires narrow specialized abilities and substantial time, so that the pollen data are always delayed and subject to sampling-and counting-related uncertainties. Emerging new approaches to automatic pollen monitoring can, in principle, allow for realtime availability of the data with no human involvement. The goal of the current paper is to evaluate the capabilities of the new Plair Rapid-E pollen monitor and to construct a first-level pollen recognition algorithm. The evaluation was performed for three devices located in Lithuania, Serbia and Switzerland, with independent calibration data and classification algorithms. The Rapid-E output data include multi-angle scattering images and the fluorescence spectra recorded at several times for each particle reaching the device. Both modalities of the Rapid-E output were treated with artificial neural networks (ANNs) and the results were combined to obtain the pollen type. For the first classification experiment, the monitor was challenged with a large variety of pollen types and the quality of manyto- many classification was evaluated. It was shown that in this case, both scattering-and fluorescence-based recognition algorithms fall short of acceptable quality. The combinations of these algorithms performed better, exceeding 80% accuracy for 5 out of 11 species. Fluorescence spectra showed similarities among different species, ending up with three well-resolved groups: (Alnus, Corylus, Betula and Quercus), (Salix and Populus) and (Festuca, Artemisia and Juniperus). Within these groups, pollen is practically indistinguishable for the first-level recognition procedure. Construction of multistep algorithms with sequential discrimination of pollen inside each group seems to be one of the possible ways forward. In order to connect the classification experiment to existing technology, a short comparison with the Hirst measurements is presented and the issue of false positive pollen detections by Rapid-E is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据