期刊
LAND ECONOMICS
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 353-368出版社
UNIV WISCONSIN PRESS
DOI: 10.3368/le.95.3.353
关键词
-
资金
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions [CE11001000104]
- Australian Government
This paper shows how researchers can make incorrect interpretations of models that include heterogeneity in error variance (scale) if they do not recognize the implications of parameter estimates being conflated with scale. The research contribution is to define best practice management of scale heterogeneity in discrete choice experiments and to empirically demonstrate issues that arise when best practice is ignored. We illustrate the problem using data from two discrete choice experiments, showing that reported parameters vary due to arbitrary normalization decisions. We report examples of papers where authors fall into this trap, potentially leading to erroneous evaluation of models.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据