4.5 Article

ACDD4 score: A simple tool for assessing risk of pneumonia after stroke

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 372, 期 -, 页码 399-402

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2016.10.050

关键词

Risk score; Infection; Stroke care; Hospital-acquired pneumonia prediction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pneumonia is a serious but a preventable stroke complication. Prediction scales for post-stroke pneumonia have been proposed with an intent to improve surveillance and prevention but they remain under-utilized in clinical practice. Most existing scales were developed using both ventilated and non-ventilated patients which may affect their accuracy. We derived and validated a novel, pragmatic scale to predict hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) after stroke employing only a non-ventilated stroke cohort. Methods: All consecutive patients admitted with acute stroke to a large hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) codes for acute ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhages and confirmed by chart review. The following exclusion criteria were used: stroke occurring after hospitalization, pneumonia on admission, intubation, presence of brain or lung neoplasms, admission < 48 hours duration. HAP was defined using discharge ICD-9 codes. The association of relevant covariates with HAP was analyzed using multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis to develop a scoring system and validated using bootstrapping. Results: A total of 1644 patients met study criteria; 144 (8.8%) developed HAP. An 8-point pneumonia prediction scale (ACDD(4)) was derived using significant covariates (age >= 75 = 1; congestive heart failure = 1; dysarthria 1; dysphagia = 4). The risk of pneumonia varied between 2% and 33.9% with scores of 0 to 7, respectively. The c-statistic of the final model was 0.82 and bootstrap validation c-statistic was 0.81. Conclusion: ACDD4 scale is a promising tool for predicting HAP in non-ventilated stroke patients that can be easily computed at the patient's bedside. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据