3.8 Article

Urinary Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis: Relation with Urodynamic Findings and Impact on Patient's Quality of Life

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 143-150

出版社

MARMARA UNIV, INST HEALTH SCIENCES
DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.564239

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; neurogenic bladder dysfunction; quality of life; urodynamic findings

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We aimed to investigate the correlations of urinary symptoms with urodynamic findings in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and their effects on quality of life. Methods: Nineteen MS patients with urinary symptoms were included. The data were obtained from files or with face-to-face interviews. Symptom types of patients were categorized as irritative, obstructive, and mixed. The Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, the King's Quality of Life Questionnaire (KQL) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Short Form were used to determine the effect of urinary symptoms on quality of life. The Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was used to assess disability. All patients underwent urodynamic examination. Results: Of the 478 patients, 34.5% had visited a psychiatrist once in their lifetime, 13.6% were diagnosed with depression, and 13.8% did not know the diagnosis of mental disease; 32.2% were suggested medication by their doctor, 16.7% did not know the name of this medication, and 13.2% stated that the suggested drug was antidepressant. Moreover, 24.9% of the patients were known to use antidepressant at least once in their lifetime, and 16.3% were still using antidepressants. Among patients using antidepressants, 32% continued using this drug upon doctor's recommendation and 13.6% continued with the diagnosis of depression. Conclusion: The urinary symptoms significantly affect the quality of life in MS patients. Since symptoms do not always correlate with the underlying pathology, it is more appropriate to give the treatment based on the bladder type in urodynamic testing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据