4.6 Article

Ternary-doped carbon electrodes for advanced aqueous solid-state supercapacitors based on a water-in-salt gel electrolyte

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 26, 页码 15801-15811

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta02690h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875165, 51772216, 21501135, 21703161]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China [14DZ2261100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The key concern in constructing high-energy supercapacitors is maximizing the electrode capacitance and the cell voltage. However, the current research usually addresses this issue by designing advanced electrodes or seeking high-potential electrolytes separately, instead of both. Herein, we demonstrate a two-pronged design of ternary-doped carbon electrodes and a high-voltage water-in-salt (WIS) gel electrolyte to support advanced aqueous-based solid-state supercapacitors. The fabrication of N/S/O multidoped carbons is quite straightforward, involving a facile benzoquinone/sulfourea polymerization and a common carbonization/activation procedure, which avoid sophisticated technique/conditions and/or time-consuming synthetic routes. The carbons feature an extraordinary surface area, high content of heteroatoms, and improved surface wettability. A highly porous gel polymer is introduced as a supporting matrix for the WIS to design a 2.3 V gel-type electrolyte, in pursuit of a new record high-energy aqueous solid-state supercapacitor of 37.7 W h kg(-1), with excellent temperature robustness in the range of 0-80 degrees C. Furthermore, an assembled flexible device delivers a stable energy output of 34.3 W h kg(-1) and demonstrates great flexibility with 91.6% energy retention even in a bending state of 180 degrees. This study presents an electrode/electrolyte cooperative effect to unlock the energy potential of aqueous flexible solid-state supercapacitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据