4.7 Article

Extreme Primordial Star Formation Enabled by High-redshift Quasars

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 879, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab223e

关键词

cosmology: theory; ISM: molecules; quasars: supermassive black holes; stars: Population III; X-rays: general

资金

  1. National Nuclear Security Administration of the US Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  2. LANL LDRD Exploratory Research Grant [20170317ER]
  3. National Science Foundation [PHY-1607611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-redshift quasars emit copious X-ray photons that heat the intergalactic medium to temperatures up to similar to 10(6) K. At such high temperatures the primordial gas will not form stars until it is assembled into dark matter halos with masses of up to similar to 10(11) M-circle dot, at which point the hot gas collapses and cools under the influence of gravity. Once this occurs, there is a massive reservoir of primordial gas from which stars can form, potentially setting the stage for the brightest Population (Pop) III starbursts in the early universe. Supporting this scenario, recent observations of quasars at z similar to 6 have revealed a lack of accompanying Ly alpha emitting galaxies, consistent with suppression of primordial star formation in halos with masses below similar to 10(10) M-circle dot. Here we model the chemical and thermal evolution of the primordial gas as it collapses into such a massive halo irradiated by a nearby quasar in the run-up to a massive Pop III starburst. We find that, within similar to 100 kpc of the highest-redshift quasars discovered to date, the Lyman-Werner flux produced in the quasar host galaxy may be high enough to stimulate the formation of a direct collapse black hole (DCBH). A survey with single pointings of the NIRCam instrument at individually known high-z quasars may be a promising strategy for finding Pop III stars and DCBHs with the James Webb Space Telescope.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据