4.6 Article

Nitrogen self-doped activated carbons via the direct activation of Samanea saman leaves for high energy density supercapacitors

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 38, 页码 21724-21732

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03437d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institution of Foreign Higher Education, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (2018)
  2. Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (NARO), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, nitrogen self-doped activated carbons (ACs) obtained via the direct activation of Samanea saman green leaves (SSLs) for high energy density supercapacitors were investigated. The SSL-derived direct-activated carbons (hereinafter referred to SD-ACs) were synthesized by impregnating sodium hydroxide as an activating agent and heating up to 720 degrees C without a hydrothermal carbonization or pyrolysis step. The optimum condition was investigated by varying the weight ratio of raw SSLs to NaOH. Surpassing the ACs derived from the two-step convention method, SD-ACs showed superior properties, including a higher surface area (2930 m(2) g(-1)), total pore volume (1.37 cm(3) g(-1)) and nitrogen content (4.6 at%). Moreover, SD-ACs exhibited enhanced electrochemical properties with specific gravimetric and volumetric capacitances of 179 F g(-1) and 88 F cm(-3) in an organic electrolyte, respectively, a high capacitance retention of approximately 87% at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1) and excellent cycling stability of 97.5% after 3000 cycles at a current density of 5 A g(-1). Moreover, the potential window of the supercapacitor cell was extended to 3.5 V with a significantly enhanced energy density of up to 79 W h kg(-1). These results demonstrate that the direct activation of nitrogen-enriched SSLs offers advantages in terms of simplicity, low-cost and sustainable synthetic route to achieve nitrogen self-doped ACs for high energy density supercapacitors, which exhibit superior properties to that of ACs prepared via the conventional method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据