4.5 Article

A preliminary investigation of sleep quality in functional neurological disorders: Poor sleep appears common, and is associated with functional impairment

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 378, 期 -, 页码 163-166

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.05.021

关键词

Functional neurological disorders; Dissociative seizures; Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures; Functional motor symptoms; Functional movement disorder; Conversion disorder; Sleep; Insomnia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Functional neurological disorders (FND) are disabling conditions for which there are few empirically supported treatments. Disturbed sleep appears to be part of the FND context; however, the clinical importance of sleep disturbance (extent, characteristics and impact) remains largely unknown. We described sleep quality in two samples, and investigated the relationship between sleep and FND-related functional impairment. Methods: We included a sample recruited online via patient charities (N = 205) and a consecutive clinical sample (N = 20). Participants completed validated measures of sleep quality and sleep characteristics (e.g. total sleep time, sleep efficiency), mood, and FND-related functional impairment. Results: Poor sleep was common in both samples (89% in the clinical range), which was characterised by low sleep efficiency (M = 65.40%) and low total sleep time (M = 6.05 h). In regression analysis, sleep quality was negatively associated with FND-related functional impairment, accounting for 1.6% of the variance and remaining significant after the introduction of mood variables. Conclusions: These preliminary analyses suggest that subjective sleep disturbance (low efficiency, short sleep) is common in FND. Sleep quality was negatively associated with the functional impairment attributed to FND, independent of depression. Therefore, sleep disturbance may be a clinically important feature of FND. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据