4.4 Article

Teachers' relatedness with students as a predictor of students' intrinsic motivation, self-concept, and reading achievement

期刊

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 215-225

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.03.005

关键词

Elementary; Reading; Motivation; Self-Concept; Teacher-student relationships

资金

  1. Quebec Ministry of Health
  2. Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Societe et la Culture (FQRSC)
  3. Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR)
  5. Ste. Justine's Hospital Research Center
  6. Fondation Lucie et Andre Chagnon
  7. University of Montreal
  8. Canada Research Chair Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to examine how teachers' relatedness with students is linked to academic achievement in reading for elementary students transitioning from kindergarten (five years old) to first grade (six years old). Intrinsic motivation and self-concept in reading were examined as potential mediators of this relation. While data were collected from 820 kindergarten students (441 boys, 379 girls), their teachers also answered questions regarding their relatedness with the students and the students' reading abilities. One year later, the students completed items measuring their intrinsic motivation and self-concept for reading, while the teachers rated the students' reading achievement. Structural equation modeling analysis was used to test a sequential mediational model. Overall, the results showed that kindergarten teachers' relatedness with students predicts intrinsic motivation for reading and that self-concept for reading positively mediates the relation between intrinsic motivation and reading achievement (all relations are significant at p<.01). These results may have implications for educators aiming to improve reading achievement, strengthen students' academic self-concept, and encourage intrinsic motivation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据