4.6 Article

Development and characterization of cross-linked gellan gum and retrograded starch blend hydrogels for drug delivery applications

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.005

关键词

Gellan gum; Retrograded starch; Hydrogels; Rheology; Structure; Texture

资金

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [832236/1999-3]
  2. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The retrogradation of high amylose starch (5% or 10%), by isothermal cycles at 4 degrees C (method 1) or by alternating thermal cycles (method 2) was efficient and promoted important structural modifications. Hydrogels of gellan gum and starch retrograded blends, containing or not ketoprofen, were prepared by ionic and dual cross-linking, at different concentrations of polymer and cross-linkers, and characterized by texture and rheological analysis, X-ray diffraction and morphological analysis. The ionic cross-linking and starch retrograded by method 1 contributed to the improvement of hardness and cohesiveness of hydrogels while the dual cross-linking and starch retrograded by method 2 favored the adhesiveness. The rising of polymer concentration lead to the improvement of all mechanical parameters. Rheological data demonstrated that non-cross-linked dispersions showed a behavior of weak gels and the cross-linked hydrogels presented a predominantly elastic behavior (G' >> G), peculiar of strong gels. X-ray diffraction, rheological data and the scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM) revealed that the increase of polymers and cross linkers concentration and the presence of drug resulted in stronger and more stable tridimensional structures. The suitable adhesiveness and high strength and elasticity of hydrogels H253IC-KT, H255IC-KT, H21053DC-KT and H21055DC-KT make them more promising materials for the design of mucoadhesive drug delivery systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据