4.6 Article

Freestanding CNT-modified graphitic carbon foam as a flexible anode for potassium ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 26, 页码 15774-15781

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta03245b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Research Program of China [2018YFB0905400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91326102, 51622210, 51872277]
  3. Science and Technology Development Foundation of China Academy of Engineering Physics [2013A0301012]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Research Foundation of Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK3430000004]
  6. DNL cooperation Fund, CAS [DNL180310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) have attracted more and more attention because of the abundant resources and low cost of potassium. The development of KIBs has been hindered due to the lack of electrode materials with high reversible capacity and long cycle life. Graphitic carbon as an anode for KIBs shows poor cyclability because the insertion of K-ions leads to huge volume expansion and structural collapse. Herein, we design carbon nanotube (CNT) modified graphitic carbon foam (CNTs/GCF) with 3D porous interconnected nanoarchitecture to boost the cyclability and rate performance of KIBs. The CNTs/GCF exhibits excellent electrochemical performance in terms of reversible capacity (226 mA h g(-1) after 800 cycles with a capacity retention of 98% at 0.1 A g(-1)), cycle life (127 mA h g(-1) after 2000 cycles with a capacity retention of 96% at 0.5 A g(-1)) and rate capability (254, 233, 204, 113, 85 and 74 mA h g(-1) at 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8 and 1 A g(-1)). The highly conductive CNTs shorten ion diffusion paths and the 3D GCF network facilitates electron transport and promotes the rapid migration of electrolyte ions. In situ Raman spectra prove that the CNTs/GCF shows the hybrid potassium storage mechanism of surface adsorption and intercalation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据