4.4 Article

Assembling global conservation governance

期刊

GEOFORUM
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 56-65

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.03.012

关键词

Global environmental governance; Collaborative event ethnography; Field configuration; Assemblage; Biodiversity conservation; Methodology

资金

  1. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  2. US National Science Foundation [1027194, 1027201, 1560812]
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1560812] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  6. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [1027201] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  8. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1027194] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the configuration of global environmental governance has become more complex over the past fifty years, numerous scholars have underscored the importance of understanding the transnational networks of public, private and nonprofit organizations that comprise it. Most methodologies for studying governance emphasize social structural elements or institutional design principles and focus less attention on the social interactions that generate diffuse, hybrid regimes. Yet capturing the dynamics of these networks requires a relational methodology that can account for a range of elements that constantly shift and change relative to overlapping institutional boundaries. Collaborative Event Ethnography draws on insights from multi-sited, team, and institutional ethnography to assemble teams of researchers to study major international conferences, which offer important political spaces where public, private, and nonprofit actors align around sanctioned logics and techniques of governance. Drawing on insights generated from these conferences and field sites across the globe, we trace the constitutive forces behind paradigm shifts in biodiversity conservation, specifically the interconnected rise of market-based approaches, global targets, and new conservation enclosures. We show how the iterative refining of the methodology over five events generated an increasingly robust understanding of global conservation governance as processual, dynamic, and contingent, constituted through constantly shifting assemblages of state and nonstate actors, devices and narratives that collectively configure fields of governance. Finally, we reflect on how our team, as an evolving combination of researchers, research interests, and data collection tools itself an assemblage, has informed the continual refinement of the methodology and generated novel understandings of global conservation governance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据