4.7 Article

Achieving rapid analysis of Li isotopes in high-matrix and low-Li samples with MC-ICP-MS: new developments in sample preparation and mass bias behavior of Li in ICPMS

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 34, 期 7, 页码 1503-1513

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ja00076c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41803021, 41430104, 41873027]
  2. CAGS Research Fund [JYYWF20183102]
  3. China Geological Survey Project [DD20190002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency of accurate determination of the lithium (Li) isotopic ratio by MC-ICP-MS is limited by current chemical purification procedures and instrument settings. The elution curve drifts significantly for matrices with a high matrix (e.g., Ca), and must therefore be checked frequently. The mass bias behavior of Li in inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) is unclear, which restricts the analysis of Li isotope compositions at low signal intensities. A novel method to purify Li and analyze the Li isotopic ratio is robust for a large variety of samples, where the efficient capacity of the resin is improved. The time required for purification and the volume of acid are significantly decreased, and cation-exchange resins can be easily and rapidly cleaned for re-use. Shift of the Li elution peaks is diminished. The mass bias behavior of Li isotopes in the ICP is revealed through high-resolution imaging of Li intensity and isotopic ratio, and the most stable zone is identified. The method has been validated by analysis of standard geological reference materials over 1.5 years. We report the Li isotope composition of a dolomite standard GSR-12 (delta Li-7 = 13.55 +/- 0.37 parts per thousand, 2 sigma). The long-term external precision of this method is better than +/- 0.47 parts per thousand (2 sigma) for delta Li-7, and is suitable for analysis of geological samples. The new method is faster, but also precise and accurate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据