4.2 Article

Metabolic responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol stress using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

期刊

MOLECULAR OMICS
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 216-221

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9mo00055k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21375046, 21605056]
  2. Project of Science and Technology Development of Jilin Province [20190303116SF]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province [20180101292JC]
  4. Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals of Jilin Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethanol, as one of the most important biological fuels, is mainly produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. But with the accumulation of ethanol, the viability and growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is often stressed during fermentation. At present, the reaction mechanism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ethanol stress has not been fully elucidated. In this paper, a metabolomics approach with gas chromatographymass spectrometry was performed to investigate the metabolic changes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultured with 0%, 2% and 5% ethanol. The results of partial least-squares discriminant analysis (IPLS-DA) clearly reflected the metabolic variations induced by ethanol stress. It was found that in total 36 metabolites changed significantly with univariate analysis, including amino acids, organic acids, and fatty acids. The citrate cycle and alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism were found as the markedly perturbed metabolic pathways. Significant alterations of metabolites in these pathways (Isuccinic acid, citric acid, pyruvate, fumarate, glutamate, aspartate, alanine) indicated that ethanol stress impeded the citrate cycle at the node of citrate. This might cause insufficient energy supply of the cell and the synthesis reduction of some amino acids and other substrates. Furthermore, the growth of the cell was slowed down. These results demonstrated that metabolomics has potential to reveal the regulation mechanisms for ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据