4.7 Review

Radiocarbon Tracers in Toxicology and Medicine: Recent Advances in Technology and Science

期刊

TOXICS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics7020027

关键词

accelerator mass spectrometry; cavity ring down spectrophotometry; radiocarbon; naphthalene; benzo[a]pyrene; cell turnover; triclocarban; metastasis; DNA adducts; biomarkers

资金

  1. Cancer Center Support Grant from the NCI [P30CA093373]
  2. NIH/NCI K12 award [K12 CA 138464]
  3. CTSC Pilot Program/NIH award [ULT1TR001860]
  4. UC Davis Academic Senate grant [FJ161B1]
  5. UC Davis School of Medicine Dean
  6. American Cancer Society [IRG-95-125-16]
  7. LLNL [LDRD 08-LW-100]
  8. Knapp Family Fund [1R01CA176803-01]
  9. VA Merit [1I01 BX003840]
  10. SBIR [HHSN261201000133C, HHSN261201200048C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes recent developments in radiocarbon tracer technology and applications. Technologies covered include accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), including conversion of samples to graphite, and rapid combustion to carbon dioxide to enable direct liquid sample analysis, coupling to HPLC for real-time AMS analysis, and combined molecular mass spectrometry and AMS for analyte identification and quantitation. Laser-based alternatives, such as cavity ring down spectrometry, are emerging to enable lower cost, higher throughput measurements of biological samples. Applications covered include radiocarbon dating, use of environmental atomic bomb pulse radiocarbon content for cell and protein age determination and turnover studies, and carbon source identification. Low dose toxicology applications reviewed include studies of naphthalene-DNA adduct formation, benzo[a]pyrene pharmacokinetics in humans, and triclocarban exposure and risk assessment. Cancer-related studies covered include the use of radiocarbon-labeled cells for better defining mechanisms of metastasis and the use of drug-DNA adducts as predictive biomarkers of response to chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据