4.6 Article

Is mitotic rate still useful in the management of patients with thin melanoma?

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14485

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundT1 melanoma substaging was recently modified by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Although sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity is the most important prognostic factor in melanoma, there is a lack of consensus on whether SLN biopsy should be performed in patients with thin melanoma (1 mm). ObjectiveThe main aim of this study was to investigate predictors of SLN positivity in patients with thin melanoma, with a special emphasis on mitotic rate. A secondary aim was to evaluate survival in this group of patients. Materials and MethodsRetrospective multicenter observational study with analysis of age, sex, tumour location, thickness, mitotic rate, regression and microscopic satellites. Predictive factors were identified using a classification and regression tree (CART) approach. Melanoma-specific survival according to SLN status was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. ResultsWe analysed 203 patients with a melanoma 1 mm. Using the new AJCC staging criteria, the CART algorithm identified a 7.5% likelihood of SLN positivity in T1a patients. In the case of T1b melanoma, there was a 14.3% likelihood of SLN positivity in patients with a mitotic rate >1 mitosis/mm(2) and a 3.2% likelihood in those with 1 mitoses/mm(2). None of the patients with T1b disease who had 1 mitoses/mm(2) and regression had SLN positivity. In T1b patients, 5-year melanoma-specific survival was 98.7% in the SLN-negative group and 75% in the SLN-positive group (P = 0.05). When stratified by mitotic rate, survival was 100% for patients with a mitotic rate of 1 mitoses/mm(2) and 91.4% for those with >1 mitosis/mm(2) (P = 0.022). There were no deaths in the T1a subgroup. ConclusionsSentinel lymph node metastasis was less common in patients with T1b melanoma who had a mitotic rate of 1 mitoses/mm(2). Performance of SLN biopsy should be carefully considered in this subgroup of patients, particularly considering the good prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据