4.6 Article

Tris(trimethylsilyl) Phosphite (TMSPi) and Triethyl Phosphite (TEPi) as Electrolyte Additives for Lithium Ion Batteries: Mechanistic Insights into Differences during LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2-Graphite Full Cell Cycling

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 164, 期 7, 页码 A1579-A1586

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1101707jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Vehicle Technologies Program (DOE-VTP)
  2. Applied Battery Research (ABR) for Transportation Program
  3. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tris(trimethylsilyl) phosphite (TMSPi) has emerged as an useful electrolyte additive for lithium ion cells. This work examines the use of TMSPi and a structurally analogous compound, triethyl phosphite (TEPi), in LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2-graphite full cells, containing a (baseline) electrolyte with 1.2 M LiPF6 in EC: EMC (3:7 w/w) and operating between 3.0-4.4 V. Galvanostatic cycling data reveal a measurable difference in capacity fade between the TMSPi and TEPi cells. Furthermore, lower impedance rise is observed for the TMSPi cells, because of the formation of a P-and O-rich surface film on the positive electrode that was revealed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy data. Elemental analysis on negative electrodes harvested from cycled cells show lower contents of transition metal (TM) elements for the TMSPi cells than for the baseline and TEPi cells. Our findings indicate that removal of TMS groups from the central P-O core of the TMSPi additive enables formation of the oxide surface film. This film is able to block the generation of reactive TM-oxygen radical species, suppress hydrogen abstraction from the electrolyte solvent, and minimize oxidation reactions at the positive electrode-electrolyte interface. In contrast, oxidation of TEPi does not yield a protective positive electrode film, which results in inferior electrochemical performance. (C) The Author(s) 2017. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据