4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A Simulation Framework for Battery Cell Impact Safety Modeling Using LS-DYNA

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 164, 期 1, 页码 A6440-A6448

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0661701jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  2. United States Army TARDEC [DE-EE0007288]
  3. Livermore Software Technology Corporation
  4. Ford Motor Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development process of electrified vehicles can benefit significantly from computer-aided engineering tools that predict the multiphysics response of batteries during abusive events. A coupled structural, electrical, electrochemical, and thermal model framework has been developed within the commercially available LS-DYNA software. The finite element model leverages a three-dimensional mesh structure that fully resolves the unit cell components. The mechanical solver predicts the distributed stress and strain response with failure thresholds leading to the onset of an internal short circuit. In this implementation, an arbitrary compressive strain criterion is applied locally to each unit cell. A spatially distributed equivalent circuit model provides an empirical representation of the electrochemical response with minimal computational complexity. The thermal model provides state information to index the electrical model parameters, while simultaneously accepting irreversible and reversible sources of heat generation. The spatially distributed models of the electrical and thermal dynamics allow for the localization of current density and corresponding temperature response. The ability to predict the distributed thermal response of the cell as its stored energy is completely discharged through the short circuit enables an engineering safety assessment. A parametric analysis of an exemplary model is used to demonstrate the simulation capabilities. (C) The Author(s) 2017. Published by ECS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据