4.6 Article

Microstructure and Discharge Behavior of Mg-Al-Sn-In Anode Alloys

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 164, 期 7, 页码 A1745-A1754

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.0091709jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University Project, China [2014zzts019]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81472058]
  3. ShanDong province project of outstanding subject talent group
  4. Research Foundation of Health and Family Planning commission of Hunan province, China [A2016003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Mg-6% Al-1% Sn-1% In (wt%) alloy is fabricated with the conventional casting method. Then an alloy sheet with a thickness of 2 mm is obtained by hot extrusion with the extrusion ratio of 47.5: 1. After annealing at 200 degrees C, 250 degrees C or 300 degrees C, respectively, the alloy sheets are ready for further testing. Microstructures and discharge behaviors of the alloys under different conditions are investigated by morphology observation and electrochemical measurements. The Mg-Al-Sn-In alloy annealed at 200 degrees C exhibits better discharge performance because of uniform microstructure, fine grains, little crystalline defects, fine Mg17Al12 and Mg2Sn precipitates. AZ31, Mg-6% Al-1% Sn and Mg-6% Al-1% In alloys prepared by the same craft are used for comparisons. The result shows that the discharge property of the Mg-Al-Sn-In alloy with 200 degrees C annealing treatment is superior to that of other alloys. Detailed reasons of this result are revealed by polarization test, electrochemical impedance test and corroded morphology. It is shown that the simple primary battery, using the 200 degrees C annealed Mg-Al-Sn-In alloy sheets as anodes, can provide 1.527 V average voltage and its specific energy reaches 98.3 Whkg(-1). Thus, the 200 degrees C annealed Mg-Al-Sn-In alloy has the potential application value for seawater-activated battery. (C) 2017 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据