4.6 Article

Stability of Pt Nanoparticles on Alternative Carbon Supports for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 164, 期 9, 页码 F995-F1004

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2.1611709jes

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Energie
  2. University of Tartu (Estonia) from the Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung
  3. Estonian Ministry of Education and Research [IUT20-16]
  4. EU through the European Regional Development Fund [TK141]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pt supported on carbon black, commonly used as PEM fuel cell catalyst, underlies electrochemical instabilities in terms of carbon corrosion and platinum degradation. To better understand the influence of the support on nature and extent of catalyst aging, Pt was synthesized on four different substrates: Carbon black, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and a nanocomposite of indium tin oxide with rGO (ITO-rGO). The four Pt catalysts and the separate supports were studied on their durability using an accelerated stress test (AST, -0.02-1.40 V-SHE). Comparable platinum degradation was shown by losses of electrochemically active surface area (EASA) and activity for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and by identical location transmission electron microscopy (IL-TEM). With respect to the supports, highest instability of carbon black was observed investigating the double layer capacitance and amounts of hydroquinone (HQ) species. MWCNTs showed the lowest degradation. Thus, AST provoked strongly different extents of support aging but similar Pt degradation. In view of complex FC catalyst degradation mechanism, only negligible Pt detachment caused by support degradation and rather dominating Pt dissolution and agglomeration-additionally evidenced by IL-TEM-is assumed here. Regarding ITO-rGO, neither carbon support nor platinum stabilization by ITO nanoparticles has been observed. (C) The Author(s) 2017. Published by ECS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据