4.6 Article

Reversible Mechanical Deformations of Soft Microchannel Networks for Sensing in Soft Robotic Systems

期刊

ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aisy.201900027

关键词

microfluidics; soft actuators; soft lithography; soft robotics; tactile sensing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS: 1542182]
  2. Nebraska Research Initiative
  3. Department of Chemistry
  4. Nebraska Center for Materials and Nano Science (NCMN), at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  5. 3M

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microfluidics has enabled numerous applications in, for example, analytical chemistry, medical diagnostics, microelectronics, and soft robotics. In most of these applications, the geometries of the microchannels are of fixed dimensions that (ideally) remain invariant during operation. In soft robotics, however, the geometries of the microchannels contained in soft actuation systems are inherently dynamic, and the specific dimensions are expected to change during operation, and, by extension, the fluid transport properties of the system are variable. If this characteristic is not properly considered, or if methods are not developed to control it, the progress of soft robotic devices with distributed fluid transport systems can be hampered. Herein, the deformation of soft microchannel networks is investigated using a finite-element method and experimental observations, and the understandings are applied to imbibe sensing capabilities in soft robots that have integrated microfluidic networks with dynamic channel geometries of predictable dimensions. This approach enables the fabrication of soft fluid transport systems with deterministic deformation characteristics-a capability that is specifically applied to touch and actuation sensing in soft actuators. This work provides insight into the channel deformation processes expected in soft robotic systems with embedded networks of microchannels, enabling devices with reliable/predictable transport properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据