4.6 Article

A SERS-based immunoassay for the detection of α-fetoprotein using AuNS@Ag@SiO2 core-shell nanostars

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 7, 期 27, 页码 8432-8441

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9tc01890e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61675162]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JM8064, 2017JM6023]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600798]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China [2016BSHYDZZ05]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xjj2016088]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based sandwich type immunoassay was developed for the detection of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) with high sensitivity, reproducibility and selectivity. In the immunoassay, an antibody immobilized nitrocellulose (NC) membrane was employed to capture AFP and antibody conjugated silica coated gold/silver core-shell nanostars (AuNS@Ag@SiO2) were used as SERS probes. AuNS@Ag was synthesized by the direct deposition of Ag on the AuNS. The Ag shell grew outward from the center towards the tips and adopted a polyhedral shape. The AuNS@Ag nanoparticles were shown to have higher SERS activity than gold nanostars (AuNSs), and their LSPR wavelengths could be finely tuned across a wide spectrum ranging from visible to near-infrared by simply adjusting the Ag shell thickness. The silica coating improved colloidal stability of the nanostructure and provided functionality for antibody conjugation. By using 4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA) as a Raman reporter molecule, the proposed SERS sensor is able to detect AFP with a low limit of detection (LOD) of 0.72 pg mL(-1) and a wide and clinically relevant linear detection range from 3 pg mL(-1) to 3 mu g mL(-1). Hence, this SERS-based immunoassay provides a strategy for the detection of trace AFP and has potential to assist in the monitoring of prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据