3.9 Article

Race and sex differences in ambulatory blood pressure measures among HIV plus adults

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2017.05.002

关键词

African-Americans; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; health status disparities

资金

  1. University of Alabama at Birmingham Center For AIDS Research CFAR, a National Institutes of Health [P30AI027767]
  2. NIAID
  3. NCI
  4. NICHD
  5. NHLBI
  6. NIDA
  7. NIA
  8. NIDDK
  9. NIGMS
  10. OAR
  11. American Heart Association [15SFRN2390002]
  12. NHLBI [T32HL00745733, K24HL125704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) can identify phenotypes that cannot be measured in the clinic. Determining race and sex disparities in ABPM measures among HIV + individuals may improve strategies to diagnose and treat hypertension in this high-risk population. We compared ABPM measures between 24 African-American and 25 white HIV + adults (36 men and 13 women). Awake systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were similar in African Americans and whites. After multivariable adjustment, sleep SBP and DBP were 9.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 4.7, 14.8) and 8.4 mrn Hg (95% CI: 4.3, 12.5) higher, respectively, among African-Americans compared with whites. After multivariable adjustment, SBP and DBP dipping ratios were 5.2% (95% CI: 1.7%, 8.7%) and 6.1% (95% CI 2.0%, 10.3%) smaller among African-Americans compared with whites. After multivariable adjustment, awake and sleep SBP and DBP were higher in men compared to women. There was no difference in SBP or DBP dipping ratios comparing men and women. The prevalence of awake masked hypertension was 42% in men versus 17% in women, and the prevalence of sleep masked hypertension was 57% among African-Americans versus 18% among whites. These data suggest that ABPM measures differ by race and sex in HIV+ adults. Copyright (C) 2017 American Society of Hypertension. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据