4.4 Review

Interactions Between Atopic Dermatitis and Staphylococcus aureus Infection: Clinical Implications

期刊

ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 593-603

出版社

KOREAN ACAD ASTHMA ALLERGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
DOI: 10.4168/aair.2019.11.5.593

关键词

Atopic dermatitis; Staphylococcus aureus; microbiome

资金

  1. NIAMS [R01 AR 41256]
  2. Environmental Health Center Project of the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Staphylococcus aureus commonly colonizes the skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients and contributes to the development and exacerbation of AD. Multiple factors are associated with colonization of AD skin by S. aureus, including the strength of S. aureus-corneocyte adhesion, deficiency of antimicrobial peptides, decreased levels of filaggrin and filaggrin degradation products, overexpressed Th2/Th17 cytokines, microbial dysbiosis and altered lipid profiles. S. aureus colonization on AD skin causes skin barrier dysfunction through virulence factors such as superantigens (toxins), enzymes and other proteins. Furthermore, colonization of AD skin by S. aureus exacerbates AD and may contribute to microbial dysbiosis, allergen sensitization, Th2/Th17 polarization, development of atopic march and food allergy in AD patients. Skin colonization of S. aureus, particularly methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), is one of the major challenges commonly encountered in the management of AD. Bleach bath, and topical or systemic antibiotics could be used to control S. aureus infection on AD skin. However, careful use of antibiotics is required to control the occurence of MRSA. Recently, various strategies, including microbiome transplant, monoclonal antibodies against virulent toxins, vaccines and recombinant phage endolysin, have been studied to control S. aureus infection on AD skin. Further advances in our understanding of S. aureus could provide us with ways to manage S. aureus colonization more effectively in AD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据