4.7 Article

Does Person-Centered Care Improve Residents' Satisfaction With Nursing Home Quality?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.007

关键词

Nursing homes; person-centered care; satisfaction; long-term care; culture change; quality

资金

  1. Retirement Research Foundation [2015-060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Person-centered care (PCC) is meant to enhance nursing home residents' quality of life (QOL). Including residents' perspectives is critical to determining whether PCC is meeting residents' needs and desires. This study examines whether PCC practices promote satisfaction with QOL and quality of care and services (QOC and QOS) among nursing home residents. Design: A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study using an in-person survey. Setting: Three hundred twenty nursing homes in Kansas enrolled or not enrolled in a pay-forperformance program, Promoting Excellent Alternatives in Kansas (PEAK 2.0), to promote PCC in nursing homes. Participants: A total of 6214 nursing home residents in 2013-2014 and 5538 residents in 2014-2015, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score >8, participated in face-to-face interviews. Results were aggregated to the nursing home level. Measurements: My InnerView developed a Resident Satisfaction Survey for Kansas composed of 32 questions divided into QOL, QOC, QOS, and global satisfaction subdomains. Results: After controlling for facility characteristics, satisfaction with overall QOL and QOC was higher in homes that had fully implemented PCC. Although some individual measures in the QOS domain (eg, food) showed greater satisfaction at earlier levels of implementation, high satisfaction was observed primarily in homes that had fully implemented PCC. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence for the effectiveness of PCC implementation on nursing home resident satisfaction. The PEAK 2.0 program may provide replicable methods for nursing homes and states to implement PCC systematically. (C) 2017 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据