4.6 Article

Recognition of Delirium in Postoperative Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 65, 期 9, 页码 1932-1938

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.14933

关键词

delirium; encephalopathy; delirium screening tools; postoperative; diagnosis

资金

  1. ESICM Clinical Research Award
  2. Technology Foundation STW Take-off grant [14066]
  3. EU [H2020-PHC-12-2014-672974]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesTo evaluate to what extent delirium experts agree on the diagnosis of delirium when independently assessing exactly the same information and to evaluate the sensitivity of delirium screening tools in routine daily practice of clinical nurses. DesignProspective observational longitudinal study. SettingThree medical centers in the Netherlands. ParticipantsElderly postoperative adults (n = 167). MeasurementsA researcher examined participants daily (Postoperative Day 1-3) for delirium using a standardized cognitive assessment and interview including the Delirium Rating Scale Revised-98 as global impression without any cut-off values that was recorded on video. Two delirium experts independently evaluated the videos and clinical information from the last 24 hours in the participants' record and classified each assessment as delirious, possibly delirious, or not delirious. Interrater agreement between the delirium experts was determined using weighted Cohen's kappa. When there was no consensus, a third expert was consulted. Final classification was based on median score and compared with the results of the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit and Delirium Observation Scale that clinical nurses administered. ResultsFour hundred twenty-four postoperative assessments of 167 participants were included. The overall kappa was 0.61 (95% confidence interval = 0.53-0.68). There was no agreement between the experts for 89 (21.0%) assessments and a third delirium expert was needed for the final classification. Delirium screening that nurses performed detected 32% of the assessments that the experts diagnosed as (possibly) delirious. ConclusionThere was considerable disagreement in classification of delirium by experts who independently assessed exactly the same information, showing the difficulty of delirium diagnosis. Furthermore, the sensitivity of daily delirium screening by clinical nurses was poor. Future research should focus on development of objective instruments to diagnose delirium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据