4.7 Article

Mapping the Sandy Beach Evolution Around Seaports at the Scale of the African Continent

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse7050151

关键词

coastline dynamics; coastal erosion; sediment transport; port design; satellite imagery; sustainable ports

资金

  1. Urbanizing Deltas of the World program of The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [W07.69.206]
  2. Deltares strategic research program Future-proof Coastal Infrastructure and O ff shore Renewable Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Africa, several new seaport developments are being considered. In sedimentary environments, such port developments can have adverse impacts on the evolution of adjacent coastlines. To learn from past port engineering practice, we created a unique database containing the coastline evolution and characteristics of 130 existing African seaports. Whereas the systematic mapping of coastal impacts was previously hampered by data availability, innovative automated satellite image processing techniques have enabled us to intercompare ports at an unprecedented continental scale. We found large geographical differences with respect to the beach evolution. The total detected changes in the beach area between 1984 and 2018 totaled 44 km(2), of which ca. 23 km(2) is accretion and ca. 21 km(2) is erosion. The top 10% hotspot ports account for more than 65% of these changes. These hotspots exhibit common characteristics, namely: they are located on open coastlines, have large alongshore sediment transport potential, and have large cross-shore breakwaters. Although these driving characteristics are well established in coastal engineering theory, our results indicate that the beaches adjacent to the existing seaports have been and remain seriously affected by these drivers. Our results can be used to inform beach maintenance strategies for existing seaports and to support planners and engineers to minimize long-term coastal impacts of port expansions and new port developments in Africa in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据