4.4 Article

Biodiversity genomics of North American Dryobates woodpeckers reveals little gene flow across the D. nuttallii x D. scalaris contact zone

期刊

AUK
卷 136, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/auk/ukz015

关键词

contact zone; Dryobates; genomics; hybrid zone; Picoides; RAD-seq; woodpeckers

资金

  1. American Museum of Natural History
  2. American Ornithologists' Union
  3. University of Kansas Biodiversity Institute
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DEB-1406989, DEB-1557053, DEB-1241181]
  5. New York University Abu Dhabi [AD180]
  6. NYUAD Research Institute [G1205-1205A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evolutionary biologists have long used behavioral, ecological, and genetic data from contact zones between closely related species to study various phases of the speciation continuum. North America has several concentrations of avian contact zones, where multiple pairs of sister lineages meet, with or without hybridization. In a southern California contact zone, 2 species of woodpeckers, Nuttall's Woodpecker (Dryobates nuttallii) and the Ladder-backed Woodpecker (D. scalaris), occasionally hybridize. We sampled these 2 species in a transect across this contact zone and included samples of their closest relative, the Downy Woodpecker (D. pubescens), to obtain large single nucleotide polymorphism panels using restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq). Furthermore, we used whole-genome resequencing data for 2 individuals per species to identify whether patterns of diversity inferred from RAD-seq were representative of whole-genome diversity. We found that these 3 woodpecker species are genomically distinct. Although low levels of gene flow occur between D. nuttallii and D. scalaris across the contact zone, there was no evidence for widespread genomic introgression between these 2 species. Overall patterns of genomic diversity from the RAD-seq and whole-genome datasets appear to be related to distributional range size and, by extension, are likely related to effective population sizes for each species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据