3.8 Proceedings Paper

IMPACT OF STELLAR EVOLUTION ON PLANETARY HABITABILITY

期刊

ASTRO FLUID 2016
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 59-69

出版社

E D P SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1051/eas/1982006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (FNS)
  2. French Programme National National de Physique Stellaire PNPS of CNRS/INSU
  3. SEFRI project under COST Action Origins [C.140049, TD 1308]
  4. European Research Council [SPIRE 647383]
  5. ANR Blanc TOUPIES [SIMI5-6 020 01]
  6. Programme National de Planetologie (CNRS/INSU)
  7. PLATO CNES grant at Service d'Astrophysique (CEA-Saclay)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the ever growing number of detected and confirmed exoplanets, the probability to find a planet that looks like the Earth increases continuously. While it is clear that being in the habitable zone does not imply being habitable, a systematic study of the evolution of the habitable zone is required to account for its dependence upon stellar parameters. In this study, we aim to provide the community with the dependence of the habitable zone upon the stellar mass, age, metallicity, and rotation. We use stellar evolution models computed with the STAREVOL code to study the evolution of the habitable zone. Mass and metallicity are the stellar parameters that have the most dramatic effects on the habitable zone limits. The evolution of the habitable zone limits is also linked to the evolution of the stellar activity (through the Rossby number) that depends on the considered stellar mass and rotation. Using observed trends of stellar magnetic field strength we also constrain the planetary magnetic field (at the zero order) required for a sufficient magnetospheric protection during the whole stellar evolution. We explicit for the first time the systematic dependence of planet habitability on stellar metallicity and rotation along the full evolution of low- and intermediate-mass stars. These results can be used as physical inputs for a first order estimation of exoplanetary habitability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据