4.7 Article

Hospitalization for Recently Diagnosed Versus Worsening Chronic Heart Failure From the ASCEND-HF Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 69, 期 25, 页码 3029-3039

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.043

关键词

acute heart failure; chronic; de novo

资金

  1. Scios Inc.
  2. Sanofi
  3. Johnson Johnson
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Corthera
  6. Amylin
  7. Scios/Johnson Johnson
  8. National Institutes of Health
  9. European Union
  10. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  11. Pfizer
  12. Abbott Laboratories
  13. Servier
  14. Amgen
  15. Bayer
  16. Novartis
  17. BioControl
  18. Medtronic
  19. Biotronik
  20. Thoratec
  21. Madeleine
  22. Mast Therapeutics
  23. Relypsa
  24. Trevena
  25. Alere
  26. Anexon
  27. Boehringer Ingelheim
  28. Cardio3BioSciences
  29. Celladon
  30. Merck
  31. Torrent
  32. Vifor Pharma
  33. Novella
  34. Otsuka
  35. Roche Diagnostics
  36. BG Medicine
  37. Critical Diagnostics
  38. Astellas
  39. Gilead
  40. GE Healthcare
  41. ResMed
  42. Bristol-Myers Squibb

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND It is unclear how patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (HF) who are long-term chronic HF survivors differ from those with more recent HF diagnoses. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate the influence of HF chronicity on acute HF patient profiles and outcomes. METHODS The ASCEND-HF (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure) trial randomized 7,141 hospitalized patients with acute HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF) to receive nesiritide or placebo in addition to standard care. The present analysis compared patients according to duration of HF diagnosis before index hospitalization by using pre-specified cutoffs (0 to 1 month [i.e., recently diagnosed], >1 to 12 months, >12 to 60 months, and >60 months). RESULTS Overall, 5,741 (80.4%) patients had documentation of duration of HF diagnosis (recently diagnosed, n = 1,536; >1 to 12 months, n = 1,020; >12 to 60 months, n = 1,653; and >60 months, n = 1,532). Across HF duration groups, mean age ranged from 64 to 66 years, and mean ejection fraction ranged from 29% to 32%. Compared with patients with longer HF duration, recently diagnosed patients were more likely to be women with nonischemic HF etiology, higher baseline blood pressure, better baseline renal function, and fewer comorbidities. After adjustment, compared with recently diagnosed patients, patients with longer HF duration were associated with more persistent dyspnea at 24 h (>1 to 12 months, odds ratio [OR]: 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97 to 1.48; >12 to 60 months, OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.62; and >60 months, OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.60) and increased 180-day mortality (>1 to 12 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.65; >12 to 60 months, HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.33 to 2.48; and >60 months, HR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.47 to 2.77). The influence of HF duration on mortality was potentially more pronounced among female patients (interaction p = 0.05), but did not differ according to age, race, prior ischemic heart disease, or ejection fraction (all interactions, p >= 0.23). CONCLUSIONS In this acute HF trial, patient profile differed according to duration of the HF diagnosis. A diagnosis of HF for <= 1 month before hospitalization was independently associated with greater early dyspnea relief and improved post-discharge survival compared to patients with chronic HF diagnoses. The distinction between de novo or recently diagnosed HF and worsening chronic HF should be considered in the design of future acute HF trials. (A Study Testing the Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure; NCT00475852) (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据