4.6 Article

HBV Integration-mediated Cell Apoptosis in HepG2.2.15

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 10, 期 17, 页码 4142-4150

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/jca.30493

关键词

HepG2.2.15; viral integration; Hepatitis B virus; proliferation; cell cycle; apoptosis

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772575, 81502463]
  2. Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2016C33116]
  3. key project of Health Bureau of Zhejiang Province [2018274734]
  4. CSCO Merck Serono Oncology Research Fund, SCORE [Y-MX2015-038]
  5. Key Research Project of Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2015C03030]
  6. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2012AA02A205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the word. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection plays an important role in the development of HCC. However, the mechanisms by which HBV integration affects host cells remain poorly understood. HepG2.2.15 cell line is derived from HCC cell line HepG2 with stable transfection HBV expression. In this study, HepG2.2.15 cells showed decreased proliferation, G1 cell cycle arrest and increased apoptosis, when compared to HepG2 cells. HBV capture sequencing was conducted in both genome and transcriptome level, followed by RNA expression sequencing in HepG2.2.15. Here, CAMSAP2/CCDC12/DPP7/OR4F3 were found to be targets for HBV integration in both genome and transcriptome level, accompanied by alteration in their expression when compared to HepG2. Among these genes, DPP7 was the only one gene with HBV integration into its exon, meanwhile DPP7 expression level was also downregulated in HepG2.2.15 as compared to HepG2. Furthermore, DPP7 knockdown resulted in increased apoptosis through upregulation of the Bax/Bcl2 ratio in HepG2 cells. Our results suggest that HBV integration of DPP7 was involved in cell apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据