4.7 Article

Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Migraine The PREMIUM Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 70, 期 22, 页码 2766-2774

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.1105

关键词

Amplatzer PFO Occluder device; aura; double-blind randomized clinical trial; migraine; patent foramen ovale

资金

  1. Sanofi
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Keystone Heart
  5. Teva/Cephalon
  6. St. Jude Medical
  7. St. Jude Medical Incorporated, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  8. Edwards Lifesciences
  9. Biotronik

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Migraine is a prevalent and disabling disorder. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been associated with migraine, but its role in the disorder remains poorly understood.& para;& para;OBJECTIVES This study examined the efficacy of percutaneous PFO closure as a therapy for migraine with or without aura. & para;& para;METHODS The PREMIUM (Prospective, Randomized investigation to Evaluate incidence of Headache Reduction in Subjects With Migraine and PFO Using the AMPLATZER PFO Occluder to Medical Management) was a double-blind study investigating migraine characteristics over 1 year in subjects randomized to medical therapy with a sham procedure (right heart catheterization) versus medical therapy and PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO Occluder device (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota). Subjects had 6 to 14 days of migraine per month, had failed at least 3 migraine preventive medications, and had significant right-to-left shunt defined by transcranial Doppler. Primary endpoints were responder rate defined as 50% reduction in migraine attacks and adverse events. Secondary endpoints included reduction in migraine days and efficacy in patients with versus without aura. & para;& para;RESULTS Of 1,653 subjects consented, 230 were enrolled. There was no difference in responder rate in the PFO closure (45 of 117) versus control (33 of 103) groups. One serious adverse event (transient atrial fibrillation) occurred in 205 subjects who underwent PFO closure. Subjects in the PFO closure group had a significantly greater reduction in headache days (-3.4 vs. -2.0 days/month, p = 0.025). Complete migraine remission for 1 year occurred in 10 patients (8.5%) in the treatment group versus 1 (1%) in the control group (p = 0.01). & para;& para;CONCLUSIONS PFO closure did not meet the primary endpoint of reduction in responder rate in patients with frequent migraine. (C) 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据